ࡱ> =@< bjbjVV *(<<'''' 3'w(NOOOOO***(((((((*g-6(*****(OO1(****OO(**(**.''OCԍ'*'(G(0w('-*-('-' ****((****w(****-********* : Personnel meeting, 10/13/11 In attendance: David Freistroffer (chair), Pete Bagley, Steve Scilacci, Sonja Sibert, Lynn Owens Excused: Frank Daniels (sorry for messing up the scheduling, Frank), Tami Gailey Search committees the personnel committee role on the search committees and selection for the committees was discussed we discussed that our role is important for assuring that searches continue to be fair, open, and have a large breadth in the search pool Sabbatical and tenure applications due at the end of the month there will be a meeting shortly after they arrive to discuss them Emeritus application (Action item!) The personnel voted to approve the emeritus application for Joyce Shaw based on her 26 years of experience, excellence in graphic design, and her excellence in community involvement including directing theater production, work with SGA, and many, many other instances of high-quality hard work she has done for the college and Elko. Good job Joyce! Graduation handout listing of faculty Some teaching faculty have expressed a concern that teaching faculty and administrative faculty are listed together on the handout given out at graduation. We propose that we list faculty by department or larger groups (alphabetically). Groups will be determined by the graduation committee, in consultation with departments and the groups involved. Student Services could be their own group, for example; while Science department could be a group. (Action item!) Restructuring and better defining the requirements and application for tenure (All references to BoR code are to Title 2, Chapter4) The goals of restructuring should be: increased clarity in all levels of the process and requirements to explicitly and clearly align the tenure evaluation system with the faculty evaluation system when the evaluation system is a good source of objective evaluation data as it relates to Standards for Recommending Appointment with Tenure, NSHE BoR code, 4.4.2 if we are going to add something to the tenure process it should have the purpose to make the application address a particular section of BoR Code more clearly Summary of a brainstorming session we had with the goals above in mind please keep in mind we are only brainstorming excuse the intentional lack of proper punctuation and capitalization department chairs could be used to support several aspects of the requirements of BoR code, especially 4.2.2(a)2.(C) which has been interpreted by the VPAA to mean works well in the department use the composite score for teaching from the evaluation system (Total teaching role) for 4.4.2(A) more teaching observations could occur each semester to support the tenure candidate, allows teaching to be evaluated on a broader base than IDEA scores and other elements of the evaluation system for 4.4.2(a)1.(A) the review of the tenure file should be more public since the yearly evaluation by the is a broad aggregate evaluation it may not be considered a HR document BoR code 4.4.2(a)1.(B) is for non-teaching faculty and can be used to support the suggested item worksheet handed out since 2008. we seem to be well in line with 4.4.2(a)2. (all sub-parts) we could use the evaluation system more for 4.4.2(a)2. - but it might be tricky/cumbersome to dissect this information out of the evaluation system the verbiage in 4.4.2(b) should be used whenever possible in all documentation Suggested items only sheet that has been used since 2008 as a suggested table of contents standard 1: teaching/performance of assigned duties----------------------- item 1 Annual evaluation - these are not confidential items 2 and 3 seem OK item 4 Course evaluations is already included in the faculty evaluation, could be moved to a supporting documentation appendix item 5 classroom observations - we need more of these to allow more weight to go here rather than on course evaluations done by students item 6 - proof required workload was met should just read workload report to reduce confusion item 7 OK standard 2: service--------------------------------------------------------------- item 1 matches 2(A) item 2 matches 2(B) item 3 Copy of syllabi - why is this here? should this be in teaching under some de-emphasized supporting documentation area? evaluated in the faculty evaluation system better than it is ever done here. item 4 evidence of faculty senate work - matches 2(D) we should say that this explicitly means memo from chairs of committees item 5 seems like it further supports 2(C) and 2(E) not bad to have item 6 papers, articles, workshops and item 7 community service - satisfies 2(F) ____________________________________________________________ Summary: We agreed that the way to tackle this revision is to write a new suggested table of contents using the BoR code as a guide for what is required. This is not significantly different than what we currently have, but since we are incorporating the new faculty evaulation system we nee to do a complete overhaul to make it more organized and clearer. We also noted that we could have more explicit requirements placed upon the tenure committees and department chairs. These requirements should take the form of object rubric worksheets examination of the GBC NSHE tenure application could we replace the entire 1st page with the applicants CV should this type of information be required to be presented? page 2 of the tenure application says it all Possible bylaws change The wildest idea of the meeting during a brainstorming session was that the perceived legitimacy of this committee, in the eyes of some teaching faculty, might be facilitated/increased by changing the bylaws section for personnel committee to include something similar to: The ratio of teaching faculty members to non-teaching faculty members on the personnel committee shall not be less than the ratio of teaching faculty to non-teaching faculty in the Ĵý faculty en toto. We will revisit this. k z k u kxYojq h6] hH* h5\ h>*h5>*\hhCJ aJ ~G U V z Sy^ & F & F & F & F & F & FBM;v Y8P_ 6L>{ & F & FBop & F & F & F&dP (/ =!n"n#n$n% ^ 666666666vvvvvvvvv66666686666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH R`R Normal*$1$$CJKHPJ^J_H9aJmH sH tH9DA D Default Paragraph FontViV 0 Table Normal :V 44 la (k ( 0No List :/: Numbering Symbols6/6 BulletsOJPJQJ^JN"N Heading x$OJQJCJPJ^JaJ6B"6 Body Text x$/!2$ ListD"BD Caption xx $CJ6aJ]*R* Index $HbH Q0 Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ^/q^ Q0Balloon Text Char$CJKHOJPJQJ^J_H9aJtH9PK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]  (8@0(  B S  ? ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J 88^8`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J pp^p`OJQJ^J%   ^ `OJQJ^J% @ @ ^@ `OJQJ^J   ^ `OJQJ^J% ^`OJQJ^J%P^`P@@^@`0^`0``^``^`^`^``^``00^0`Q@X@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * ArialI. ??Arial Unicode MS_ OpenSymbolArial Unicode MS5. *aTahoma5Mangal?Wingdings 2A BCambria Math" hYFYFVF * *! 03 XQ!xxGBCGBC(       Oh+'0d    , 8DLT\GBC Normal.dotmGBC2Microsoft Office Word@ @d Ӎ@6jԍ@6jԍ՜.+,0 hp  Ĵý*   Title  !"#$%&'()*+-./012356789:;>?BRoot Entry FoԍA1Table-WordDocument *(SummaryInformation(,DocumentSummaryInformation84MsoDataStoreԍCԍQPCPVU12BQ==2ԍCԍItem PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q