ࡱ> ]  Hbjbjgg A &b &bW? 8L|ng*lllllfffffff$iNlggll4(g llf f U^ }dlPxɜ2F^a`:f>g0ng`nnt}dn}d\ ggngn B : Course Prefix, Number, and Title: Nurs 257 - Nursing Care of Adults with Acute and Chronic Illness Academic Year: 2016-2017 Department: Health Sciences and Human Services Section Number(s): Instructors: Heidi Johnston, Sharon Sutherland, Peggy Drussel Is this a GenEd class? Yes___ No_X__ Complete and submit your assessment report electronically to your department chair. As needed, please attach supporting documents and/or a narrative description of the assessment activities. You may use as many or as few outcomes as necessary. Class/Course OutcomesAssessment MeasuresAssessment ResultsAny Changes Made as a Result of AssessmentIn the boxes below, summarize the outcomes assessed in your class or course during the last year. If this is a GenEd class, include the appropriate GenEd objectives. In the boxes below, summarize the methods used to assess course outcomes during the last year. Include the criterion youll use to judge whether or not students have achieved the expected outcome.In the boxes below, summarize the results of your assessment activities during the last year. Include your judgement as to whether or not the criterion for student acheivement has been met.In the boxes below, summarize how you plan to use the results to improve student learning.Outcome #1: Apply adult health nursing concepts to provide safe, quality, evidence-based, patient-centered nursing care in a variety of healthcare environments to diverse adults with acute illnesses and long-term management of chronic illnesses. Assessment Measure: Clinical Evaluation Tool Simulation Evaluation Tool Clinical Assignments with written rubrics Clinical Care Packet (CCP) Nurse Practitioner Home Health Surgical Assignment Team Leader Dialysis Objective Exams Module Quizzes ATI RN TMS, skills modules and medical surgical modules aligning with course content student journaling of questions. Criterion for achievement: Clinical Evaluation Tool assessment based on faculty assessment at midterm and end of semester. Satisfactory score at end of semester. Faculty evaluation of simulation using a simulation evaluation tool based on a pass/fail criteria. Pass on simulation evaluation tool or Pass after successful simulation remediation. Score of 76% or higher on the corresponding clinical assignment rubrics. Score of 76% or higher on each objective exam. Total average of 76% or higher on module quizzes ATI Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS student completion and submission of each. Results: 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a satisfactory on the clinical evaluation tool at the end of the semester. 24 of 26 students (92%) passed the 5 simulation experience on their first attempt. 2 students passed after remediation 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Objective Exams (3 content exams, midterm exam, final exam) Exam 1 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 2 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 3 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Midterm Exam - 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - Final Exam 25 of 26 students (96%) scored > 76% 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress 26 of 26 (100%) students had an average score of 76.5% or higher on the module quizzes 26 of 26 (100%) of students completed the Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS modules for journaling Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Slight modifications made to CCP and clinical assignments to improve meeting assignment objectives. Continue to use all clinical assignments. Based on the test item analysis modifications to test questions on exams will be made by either rewriting test questions or removing test questions as applicable. Based on the student exam scores and test item analysis specific class content relating to test questions will be covered more thoroughly in the classroom. Will continue to use Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS for journaling and skills modules within the course. Outcome #2: Engage in clinical reasoning to make patient-centered care decisions for diverse adults with acute illnesses and long-term management of chronic illnesses. Assessment Measure: Faculty observation of instructor led case scenarios and discussions Simulation with Simulation Evaluation Tool Clinical Assignments with written rubrics Team Leader post clinical discussion and Team Leader Assignment Home Health Surgical Assignment Objective Exams Module Quizzes Criterion for achievement: Faculty observation of student engagement of discussion and student decision making as case scenario unfolds. Faculty evaluation of simulation using a simulation evaluation tool based on a pass/fail criteria. Pass on simulation evaluation tool or Pass after successful simulation remediation. Score of 76% or higher on the corresponding clinical assignment rubrics. Score of 76% or higher on each objective exam. Total average of 76% or higher on module quizzes Results: Successful participation of all students in discussion and student decision making during instructor led case scenarios. 24 of 26 students (92%) passed the 5 simulation experience on their first attempt. 2 students passed after remediation. 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Objective Exams (3 content exams, midterm exam, final exam) Exam 1 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 2 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 3 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Midterm Exam - 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - Final Exam 25 of 26 students (96%) scored > 76% 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress 26 of 26 (100%) students had an average score of 76.5% or higher on the module quizzes Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Slight modifications made to CCP and clinical assignments to improve meeting assignment objectives. Continue to use all clinical assignments. Based on the test item analysis modifications to test questions on exams will be made by either rewriting test questions or removing test questions as applicable. Based on the student exam scores and test item analysis specific class content relating to test questions will be covered more thoroughly in the classroom. Will continue to use Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS for journaling and skills modules within the course.Outcome #3: Select quality improvement processes to monitor in the care of diverse adults with acute illnesses and long-term management of chronic illnesses. Assessment Measure: Faculty observation students in discussions related to quality and safety concepts and how they relate to positive patient outcomes Clinical Assignments with written rubrics Surgical assignment and NPSGs All clinical assignments addressing best practice and quality improvement Home Health Objective Exams with collaborative testing Module Quizzes Criterion for achievement: Active student participation in discussions related to quality and safety concepts and how they relate to positive patient outcomes. Score of 76% or higher on the corresponding clinical assignment rubrics. Score of 76% or higher on each objective exam. Total average of 76% or higher on module quizzes Results: Successful participation of all students in discussions related to quality and safety concepts 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Objective Exams (3 content exams, midterm exam, final exam) Exam 1 = 19 of 19 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 2 = 19 of 19 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 3 = 18 of 19 (95%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress Midterm Exam - 18 of 19 (95%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress ATI Final Exam 16 of 19 students (84%) scored > 76% Collaborative testing brought several students up to a passing (76%) grade. ATI custom exam was utilized for the Final adjustments to student scores had to be made due to overall poor student performance on the exam. After final exam given faculty found out questions in ATI custom exam builder not vetted and tested by ATI; thus, were not of the quality faculty expected. 19 of 19 students had an average score of 76.5% or higher on the module quizzes Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Slight modifications made to CCP and clinical assignments to improve meeting assignment objectives. Continue to use all clinical assignments. Based on the test item analysis modifications to test questions on exams will be made by either rewriting test questions or removing test questions as applicable. Based on the student exam scores and test item analysis specific class content relating to test questions will be covered more thoroughly in the classroom. Will continue to use Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS for journaling and skills modules within the course.Outcome #4: Engage in teamwork with members of the interprofessional team, the patient, and the patients support persons when managing patient care. Assessment Measure: Clinical Evaluation Tool Simulation Evaluation Tool Clinical Assignments with written rubrics Team Leader Assignment Objective Exams with collaborative testing Module Quizzes Criterion for achievement: Clinical Evaluation Tool assessment based on faculty assessment at midterm and end of semester. Satisfactory score at end of semester. Faculty evaluation of simulation using a simulation evaluation tool based on a pass/fail criteria. Pass on simulation evaluation tool or Pass after successful simulation remediation. Score of 76% or higher on the corresponding clinical assignment rubrics. Score of 76% or higher on each objective exam. Total average of 76% or higher on module quizzes Results: 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a satisfactory on the clinical evaluation tool at the end of the semester. 24 of 26 students (92%) passed the 5 simulation experience on their first attempt. 2 students passed after remediation 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Objective Exams (3 content exams, midterm exam, final exam) Exam 1 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 2 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 3 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Midterm Exam - 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - Final Exam 25 of 26 students (96%) scored > 76% 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress 26 of 26 (100%) students had an average score of 76.5% or higher on the module quizzes Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Slight modifications made to CCP and clinical assignments to improve meeting assignment objectives. Continue to use all clinical assignments. Based on the test item analysis modifications to test questions on exams will be made by either rewriting test questions or removing test questions as applicable. Based on the student exam scores and test item analysis specific class content relating to test questions will be covered more thoroughly in the classroom. Will continue to use Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS for journaling and skills modules within the course.. Outcome #5: Apply management, legal, ethical, and professional guidelines important in the care of diverse adults with acute illnesses and long-term management of chronic illnesses. Assessment Measure: Clinical Evaluation Tool Simulation Evaluation Tool Clinical Assignments with written rubrics Clinical Care Packet (CCP) Team Leader Assignment Nurse Practitioner Assignment Home Health Objective Exams with collaborative testing Module Quizzes Criterion for achievement: Clinical Evaluation Tool assessment based on faculty assessment at midterm and end of semester. Satisfactory score at end of semester. Faculty evaluation of simulation using a simulation evaluation tool based on a pass/fail criteria. Pass on simulation evaluation tool or Pass after successful simulation remediation. Score of 76% or higher on the corresponding clinical assignment rubrics. Score of 76% or higher on each objective exam. Total average of 76% or higher on module quizzes Results: 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a satisfactory on the clinical evaluation tool at the end of the semester. 24 of 26 students (92%) passed the 5 simulation experience on their first attempt. 2 students passed after remediation 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Objective Exams (3 content exams, midterm exam, final exam) Exam 1 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 2 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Exam 3 = 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% Midterm Exam - 26 of 26 (100%) of students passed the exam with a score of > 76% - Final Exam 25 of 26 students (96%) scored > 76% 1 student received a notification of unsatisfactory progress 26 of 26 (100%) students had an average score of 76.5% or higher on the module quizzes Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Slight modifications made to CCP and clinical assignments to improve meeting assignment objectives. Continue to use all clinical assignments. Based on the test item analysis modifications to test questions on exams will be made by either rewriting test questions or removing test questions as applicable. Based on the student exam scores and test item analysis specific class content relating to test questions will be covered more thoroughly in the classroom. Will continue to use Nurse Logic 2.0 and ATI RN TMS for journaling and skills modules within the course. Outcome #6: Analyze the role of information management principles, techniques, and systems, and patient care technology to communicate, manage knowledge, mitigate error, and support decision-making on the medical/surgical unit. Assessment Measure: Clinical Evaluation Tool Simulation Evaluation Tool Surgical Assignment Criterion for achievement: Clinical Evaluation Tool assessment based on faculty assessment at midterm and end of semester. Satisfactory score at end of semester. Faculty evaluation of simulation using a simulation evaluation tool based on a pass/fail criteria. Pass on simulation evaluation tool or Pass after successful simulation remediation. Results: 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a satisfactory on the clinical evaluation tool at the end of the semester. 24 of 26 students (92%) passed the 5 simulation experience on their first attempt. 2 students passed after remediation 26 of 26 (100%) of students received a 76% or greater on the clinical assignments. Criterion Met: YesAction Plan: Continue to incorporate simulation into course. Continue to use the Clinical and Simulation tools to evaluate student clinical/simulation performance. Continue using the clinical assignments I have reviewed this report: ___Tami Mette________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Department Chair Dean Date_5-21-15_______________ Date_______________ ________________________________________________ Vice President of Academic Affairs and Student Services Date_______________     GBC Class/Course Assessment Report Revised 9/12 !besv} / 0 2 4 ^ m v ) * + 7 @ 󲦚ti[h )hPu5CJ\aJhPu5CJ\aJh.ehCJaJh55CJaJh|5CJaJhC=5CJaJh75hHc5CJaJh75h5CJaJhJ 5CJaJh5>*CJaJh+5CJaJh(55CJaJh5CJaJh]'5CJaJhJ 5CJaJhJ hJ 5CJaJ~3 4 * + A U h ; ri $Ifgd0ukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt $$Ifa$gd# 1$7$8$H$gd @ A T U g h 9 : ; P e  *    ' -EFɻɻɬԎxpphht)MCJaJhCJaJhP\hPuCJaJhP\hP\CJaJhPuhPuCJaJhPuCJaJhJ CJ\]aJh )hPu6CJ\]aJh )hPuCJ\]aJhPuCJ\]aJhPuCJaJhPu5CJ\aJh )hPu5CJ\aJh )hPuCJaJ(;   ' ne $IfgdP\ukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt A $IfgdC= $Ifgd0 $IfgdlA -Fa+.  & F $Ifgd,  & F$Ifgd  & F$Ifgdt)M  & F$Ifgd $Ifgd! $IfgdC=b#)*+迷yqiqiqaqiqaYQYQh3GCJaJhQ-CJaJh,CJaJhg,CJaJhFCJaJhKCJaJhPuCJaJhPuhPuCJaJhCJaJhhCJaJhcsCJaJhrmHCJaJhCJaJh(5h(:CJaJh(5hCJaJh(5hCJaJh CJaJh(5CJaJht)MCJaJhECJaJ*+-.HMN[]^XYZ[_ajlnpʿ෿տyyqqyyfhPuh_( CJaJhCJaJh_( CJaJhe'CJaJhPuCJaJh CJaJhFCJaJhPuhPuCJaJh,hKCJaJh(:CJaJh,hoCJaJh,hg,CJaJh,hQ-CJaJh,CJaJhg,CJaJh3GCJaJhhCJaJ(.^Y#_C^ $IfgdC8 $If^gd'3 $If^gdh  & F $Ifgd(: $Ifgd0  & F $Ifgd, "#5]_jnp   BCRTXZ\_ ǿhh'3CJaJhhCJaJh'3CJaJhhZCJaJhh)PXCJaJhhCJaJh CJaJhh,CJaJhhCJaJhhC8CJaJhPuCJaJh)PXCJaJh3GCJaJ/  ^`dg"|&KZ[e*+,ǿǷݷ|qj^hPuB*CJaJph hyUhP\hP\hP\CJaJhPuCJaJhPuh ACJaJhC8CJaJht)MCJaJh< GCJaJhhCJaJhCJaJh ACJaJhKCJaJhPuhPuCJaJhhkCJaJh CJaJhkCJaJh'3CJaJh(:h(:CJaJ$+,-.BwnnneX  & F $IfgdO $IfgdO $IfgdC= $IfgdP\ukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt $Ifgd'3,-.AB)=>]^_yzLMUVFHɾɮync[Phe'h'3CJaJhe'CJaJhPuhrmHCJaJhPuhhCJaJh,hhCJaJhCJaJhhhPuCJaJhahaB*CJaJphhaCJaJhhCJaJh0CJaJhrmHhrmHCJaJhrmHCJaJhPuCJaJhPuhPuCJaJhPuhB*CJaJphhB*CJaJph)=>O^_zLM  & F $Ifgdh $Ifgd0  & F$Ifgd0  & F$Ifgdh $If^gda & F$Ifgda  & F$Ifgdh  & F$IfgdhMVI$p " $Ifgd $Ifgd0 $If^gd'3  & F $Ifgd'3  & F $Ifgdh  & F $Ifgde'  & F$IfgdrmH $IfgdOHIKOQ-035y| #%02""""5#6#弴hmhP\\hP\hP\CJaJhPuCJaJhPuhhCJaJh CJaJhPuCJaJhPuhPuCJaJhCJaJh(:h'3CJaJhh'3CJaJhhCJaJh'3CJaJhe'hhCJaJ0""6#7#K###$a$wnaTGG  & F$IfgdrmH  & F $IfgdrmH  & F $Ifgdcs $IfgdrmH $IfgdPu $IfgdP\ukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt6#7#J#K##a$m$$$$$$$I%%%%%%%^&`&d&f&&&&(L*M*****ݯݙՑ~sh]UhcCJaJh(:h7oCJaJhPuh7oCJaJhh7oCJaJhcsh7oCJaJh7oCJaJhe'CJaJhPuhrmHCJaJh,hrmHCJaJhrmHhrmHCJaJhPuCJaJhrmHhPuCJaJhaCJaJhcsCJaJhrmHCJaJhPuhPuCJaJhPuhPuB*CJaJph!a$m$$$$$$I%%%%%%^&&&9' $If^gd7o  & F $Ifgd7o  & F $Ifgdcs  & F $IfgdrmH  & F $IfgdPu  & F $Ifgdcs $IfgdPu  & F $IfgdrmH  & F$IfgdrmH9''(((!)M*********+a- $Ifgd $IfgdPu  & F $Ifgd7o $If^gd7o**`-a-b-n---- .......c0000011 2E2P2T2V2222222222ǿҨ|tit^t^t^t^t^t^t^hhPCJaJhPuhPCJaJhPCJaJhPuhb7CJaJh,hb7CJaJhb7hPuCJaJhb7hb7CJaJhb7CJaJhPuhPuB*CJaJphhmhP\\hP\hP\CJaJhPuhPuCJaJhPuCJaJhPuh7oCJaJh CJaJhPuCJaJ$a-b--- .&.A.k...wwjjj]j  & F$Ifgdb7  & F $Ifgdb7 $IfgdPu $IfgdP\ukd($$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt ....`/0c00000?11 2E222)3}33D4E4Y4 $If^gdP  & F $IfgdP  & F $Ifgdb7 $IfgdPu  & F $IfgdPu22(3)383:3>3@3B3E33333333333D4E4X4e4f4777777777788E8K8L8ǿϴסwldwdhiCJaJhEhECJaJhECJaJhPuhPuB*CJaJphhmhP\\hP\hP\CJaJhP\hPuCJaJhPuCJaJhPuhb7CJaJh CJaJhPuCJaJhb7CJaJhPuhPuCJaJh(:hPCJaJhhPCJaJhPCJaJ'Y4f4\577777778wnaa  & F$IfgdE $IfgdP\ukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 laytb7 $Ifgd $IfgdPu 818L8c8888888k9$:n:::::J;;<  & F $IfgdP  & F $IfgdE $IfgdPu  & F $IfgdPu  & F $IfgdE  & F$IfgdE  & F$IfgdiL8b8c88888888n::::::;;<P<[<_<a<<<<<<<<<<<3=4=C=E=I=K=M=P==========>ǿǿġ(:P䴳P䴳PP䴳P䴳P䴳,䴳P䴳PP䴳P䴳䴳䴳i䴳䴳2<P<<<4===O>P>d>q>g?A $Ifgde' $IfgdPu $If^gdP  & F $IfgdP >O>P>c>p>q>AAAAAAA B"B#B>BRBmBnBCCCCCC*DDDDEEEEǿ괭ږږ|ttlaYhQn`CJaJhPuhaCJaJhaCJaJhPCJaJhPuh!(pCJaJhahaB*CJaJphh!(pCJaJhPuhPuB*CJaJph hmhP\hP\hP\CJaJhPuCJaJhPuhECJaJhe'CJaJhPuCJaJhm-vCJaJhPuhPuCJaJh(:hPCJaJ!AAAA B#B>BRBSBnBwwjj]ww & F $Ifgda  & F $Ifgd!(p $IfgdPu $IfgdP\ukd.$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 layt nBBCCC*DDDD EEEE $If^gda  & F $Ifgda  & F $Ifgde'  & F $Ifgd!(p $IfgdPu  & F $Ifgd!(p EEEEEEEEEEE F FFFFFFGGG!G6GGGHGVGWGXGZG[G]G^G`GaGcGGGHHHǿǯǯǯǯ||||sodo|hJ hCJaJhh5CJaJh*Sjh*SUhF9CJaJh|5CJaJhkoCJaJhkohkoCJ,OJQJaJ,hhCJaJh)CJaJhCJaJh5/ZCJaJh*_;5CJaJh5CJaJh)hPuCJaJhPuhfCJaJhfCJaJ'EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEukd$$Ifl\@ P($6 x\ 64 laytEEEEEEEEF F FpFFFFFFF7G8GVGWGYGZG\G]G_G`GbGgdgdhbGcGGGGHHH H$a$gdJ 1$7$8$H$gd) 1$7$8$H$gdH HhhCJaJ?P1h0:p*_;= /!"#$% Dp$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / / 4yt$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ /  4yt A$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / / 4yt$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / 4yt$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / 4yt$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / 4ytb7$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ / 4yt$$If!vh#v #v#vx#v\ :V l65 55x5\ /  / 4yt s   2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ OJQJ^J_HmH nH sH tH L`L Normal$CJOJQJ^J_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List dod Default1$7$8$H$-B*CJOJQJ^J_HaJmH phsH tH 44 Header  H$B/B  Header CharCJOJQJ^JaJ4 @"4 Footer  H$B/1B  Footer CharCJOJQJ^JaJHBH  Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJN/QN Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^JaJZYbZ Hc Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJPK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭Vc:E3v@P~Ds |w< @ @  ,H6#*2L8>EH H%'*+-.0358;>@CG; .M"a$9'a-.Y48<AnBEEbG H&(),/124679:<=?ABDEF@ @H 0(  0(  B S  ?"&,0(-==W?Y?Z?\?]?_?`?b?c?@ @ //W?Y?Z?\?]?_?`?b?c?@ @33--aaZ [ l n   ^ ` d g K[eBB=>>"%(,,/002669=::;;;;*<<====V?W?W?Y?Z?Z?\?]?_?`?b?c?s??????@ @--aaZ [ l n   ^ ` d g KeBB=>>"%(,,/002669=::;;;;*<<====V?W?W?Y?Z?Z?\?]?_?`?b?c?g?h?s????????@ @tZ0]uqN(H<&¬t^InYL#$.Oq.Hp V2vL2 Aʾc^gHMkJN,s2Q OlXNVo,RaU%X cd5Z8@' _Z^]4$[ȇV _BD&!]e}Z#Rit9 Zhjql\G:nfPxvW>{r}f ~M8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhm ^m `OJQJo(hHh=^=`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh}^}`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hH8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.h8^8`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHhx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHohH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hH8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.hh^h`^Jo(.^`.pLp^p`L.@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hH8^8`o(. ^`hH.  L^ `LhH.  ^ `hH. x^x`hH. HL^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.^`OJPJQJ^J. p^p`hH. @ L^@ `LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. P^P`hH.  L^ `LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.^`o(. p^p`hH. @ L^@ `LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. P^P`hH.  L^ `LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hH^`o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHo,R!]e]uqRiW>{]4$[:nt^kJNlV2 Zhjf ~ _ZU%X<&d5Zq.c^gH2Q O AV _xYL#8        .-j!                                   |-f                                                    x쎊                         >gZu        `T                 <                                                                                ]'o  J &  CabHc7a5+f]`6JX!_(  T%e' )'3#475-7b7C8Y9F9(:*_;W=g>2y> @ ATB-eDfFpF< GBGrmHt)M|pMw0P*S)PX5/Z];[Qn`JekqgklSl7oko!(p@*sPum-v)xbkyZ||5l(5MuTEcs5PP\7i0uQ,f|"f04hM0+C=K#|g,Q-lAOPa>E3GC%i)F'uK -=4-tm+}.eFi F,,hc5#>0[K6 a]F]geZW?Y?@ @@Unknown G*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx ArialGN Kunstler Script7.@Calibri5. .[`)Tahoma?= *Cx Courier New;WingdingsA$BCambria Math"hdd,Et 5 rt 5 r!x247?7?;QHP  $P2!xx 6TMCC Program and Discipline Assessment Report TemplateComplete and submit your assessment report to your Academic Dean. As needed, please attach supporting documents and/or a narrative description of the assessment activities in your program or discipline./Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment (SLOA)Great Basin Colleget                     Oh+'0 4@ ` l x 8TMCC Program and Discipline Assessment Report TemplateComplete and submit your assessment report to your Academic Dean. As needed, please attach supporting documents and/or a narrative description of the assessment activities in your program or discipline.0Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment (SLOA) Normal.dotmĴý2Microsoft Office Word@F#@@@2@2t 5՜.+,0\ px  ; Pam Hawkins$Truckee Meadows Community Colleger 7? 7TMCC Program and Discipline Assessment Report Template Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F!͜2@Data I1TableQroWordDocument ASummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStore2Pxɜ2HP0SU0Q2VY55Q==22Pxɜ2Item  PropertiesUCompObj r   F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q